DaveM
17th December 2004, 07:37
Dear all,
Ok so the digital age is catching me up. Although my beloved T-90 is still used and will be working hard this weekend, it seems almost inevitable that a new EOS D-SLR will replace it. Th only question I need to get a definive answer for is which one to go for given my photographic subjects.
1) Sports Horses - show jumping, 3-day evening & racing
2) Wildlife - with long lenses
3) Birds - with long lenses.
I was going to go for the 300D or secondhand 10D until that 'nice' person at Canon at a trade show let me play with them (and also an unbadged 20D). I personally found the 300d to feel too plasticy and the 10D about right - compared with what I was used to in terms of weight. I found that the apparent shutter release delay and slow fps rate fire would probably leave me wanting more especially when wanting to blitz a few images off of eg a horse jumping -> landing. I found the 20D to be really what I was used to in terms of fps and speed of response. The T90 has a 4.5fps rate so it seems illogical to downgrade just to go digital.
Should I save for the 20D for a bit longer or go with what is currently in my price-range? I think I know what to do but would just appreciate some advice from those more in the know than I am!
PS Any offers on a T90, 3 lenses, 2 converters and flash??!!!
ATB,
Dave.
Ok so the digital age is catching me up. Although my beloved T-90 is still used and will be working hard this weekend, it seems almost inevitable that a new EOS D-SLR will replace it. Th only question I need to get a definive answer for is which one to go for given my photographic subjects.
1) Sports Horses - show jumping, 3-day evening & racing
2) Wildlife - with long lenses
3) Birds - with long lenses.
I was going to go for the 300D or secondhand 10D until that 'nice' person at Canon at a trade show let me play with them (and also an unbadged 20D). I personally found the 300d to feel too plasticy and the 10D about right - compared with what I was used to in terms of weight. I found that the apparent shutter release delay and slow fps rate fire would probably leave me wanting more especially when wanting to blitz a few images off of eg a horse jumping -> landing. I found the 20D to be really what I was used to in terms of fps and speed of response. The T90 has a 4.5fps rate so it seems illogical to downgrade just to go digital.
Should I save for the 20D for a bit longer or go with what is currently in my price-range? I think I know what to do but would just appreciate some advice from those more in the know than I am!
PS Any offers on a T90, 3 lenses, 2 converters and flash??!!!
ATB,
Dave.